Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Shaver, T
Singh, A
Add filter to result:
Authors
Crowther, J
Parrish, J
Ferguson, R
Luck, J
Glewen, K
Shaver, T
Krull, D
Thompson, L
Mueller, N
Krienke, B
Mieno, T
Ingram, T
Parrish, J
Ferguson, R
Luck, J
Glewen, K
Thompson, L
Krienke, B
Mueller, N
Ingram, T
Krull, D
Crowther, J
Shaver, T
Mieno, T
Dutter, C
St Cyr, M
McDaniel, M
Carley, C
Singh, A
Topics
Graduate Award Student Poster
Type
Oral
Poster
Year
2017
2021
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results3 paper(s) found.

1. Integrating Management Zones and Canopy Sensing for Improved Nitrogen Recommendation Algorithms

Active crop canopy sensors have been studied as a tool to direct spatially variable nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications in maize, with the goal of increasing the synchrony between N supply and crop demand and thus improving N use efficiency (NUE). However, N recommendation algorithms have often proven inaccurate in certain subfield regions due to local spatial variability. Modifying these algorithms by integrating soil-based management zones (MZ) may improve their accuracy... J. Crowther, J. Parrish, R. Ferguson, J. Luck, K. Glewen, T. Shaver, D. Krull, L. Thompson, N. Mueller, B. Krienke, T. Mieno, T. Ingram

2. Comparison of Ground-Based Active Crop Canopy Sensor and Aerial Passive Crop Canopy Sensor for In-Season Nitrogen Management

Crop canopy sensors represent one tool available to help calculate a reactive in-season nitrogen (N) application rate in corn. When utilizing such systems, corn growers must decide between using active versus passive crop canopy sensors. The objectives of this study was to 1) determine the correlation between N management by remote sensing using a passive sensor and N management using proximal sensing with an active sensors. Treatments were arranged as field length strips in a randomized complete... J. Parrish, R. Ferguson, J. Luck, K. Glewen, L. Thompson, B. Krienke, N. Mueller, T. Ingram, D. Krull, J. Crowther, T. Shaver, T. Mieno

3. Soil and Soybean Responses to Planting into Terminated Prairie Strips

Prairie strips are a new conservation practice that are currently implemented in 14 Midwest US states. Prairie strips have been shown to reduce runoff, increase soil health, retain sediment and nutrients, increase biodiversity and have no effect on surrounding crop yield. Due to the comprehensive improvements to soil health under prairie strips, researchers and growers are interested in rotating them on 10-15 year cycles.  We have little-to-no knowledge on the effects of planting crops in... C. Dutter, M. St cyr, M. Mcdaniel, C. Carley, A. Singh