Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Poffenbarger, H
M Laboski, C.A
Fallow, D.J
Add filter to result:
Authors
Bean, G.M
Kitchen, N.R
Camberato, J.J
Carter, P.R
Ferguson, R.B
Fernandez, F.G
Franzen, D.W
M Laboski, C.A
Nafziger, E.D
Ransom, C.J
Sawyer, J.E
Shanahan, J
Lauzon, J.D
Gregory, S
Fallow, D.J
von Bertoldi, A.P
O'Halloran, I.P
Pagliari, P.H
M Laboski, C.A
Leuthold, S.J
Salmeron, M
Wendroth, O
Haramoto, E
Poffenbarger, H
Fitzgerald, L
Ritchey, E
McGrath, J
Shockley, J
Poffenbarger, H
Quinn, D
Lee, C
Poffenbarger, H
Qian, S
Unrine, J
Poffenbarger, H
Nalley, R
Lee, C
Poffenbarger, H
Watkins, S
Poffenbarger, H
Van Sanford, D
Topics
Positive and negatives of cover crops
Split N Applications
Graduate Award Student Poster
General
Graduate Student Award Posters
Type
Oral
Poster
Year
2015
2002
2010
2019
2018
2020
2022
2023
2024
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results9 paper(s) found.

1. Visual Correlation of Aerial Imagery with Topography and Crop Yield

A study is currently being conducted on several farms to evaluate the usefulness of aerial imagery of soil and of a growing crop to delineate within-field management zones for the purposes of site-specific management. Presented is information for one site in Kent county Ontario for which correlations between aerial images taken of the soil and of the growing crop with the spatial patterns of measured topography, soil texture, and corn yield were examined. Visual interpretation indicated a very good...

2. Can Soil Information Better Inform Canopy Sensor Algorithms for Corn?

Corn production is often limited by the loss of nitrogen (N) due to leaching, volatilization and denitrification. The use of canopy sensors for making in-season N fertilizer applications has been proven effective in matching plant N requirements with periods of rapid N uptake (V7-V11), reducing the amount of N lost to these processes. However, N recommendation algorithms used in conjunction with canopy sensor measurements have not proven accurate in many fields of the U.S. Cornbelt, resulting in... , N.R. Kitchen, J. Camberato, P.R. Carter, R.B. Ferguson, F.G. Fernandez, D.W. Franzen, F.G. Fernandez, E.D. Nafziger, C.J. Ransom, , J. Shanahan, G.M. Bean

3. Changes in Soil Test Phosphorus as a Function of Inorganic and Organic Phosphorus in Animal Manure

Understanding how and why soil test phosphorus (P) levels increase with manure and fertilizer application is important to assist in improvi ng any nutrient management plan. An incubation study investigated the change in soil test P (STP) after 42 different animal manures (dairy, beef, swine, chicken, turkey, goat, sheep, and horse) or fer tilizer were applied at a rate of 40 mg total P kg -1 to 25 different agriculturally important soils of Wisconsin. Both liquid and solid dairy and swine manure...

4. Understanding Spatial Variability in Cover Crop Growth and Decomposition

In many agricultural landscapes, topographic variability leads to downslope movement of soil, water, and nutrients, causing heterogeneity in both crop yield and soil fertility throughout production fields. Cover crops can slow these processes, but the impact of topography on cover crop growth and residue persistence is uncertain. We measured the growth, mixture biomass composition, and decomposition of a cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop, and cereal rye /crimson clover (Trifolium... S.J. Leuthold, M. Salmeron, O. Wendroth, E. Haramoto, H. Poffenbarger

5. Not All Litter is Created Equal: Differences in Nitrogen Mineralization Among Broiler Litter Types

Over three fourths of U.S. broiler chicken production is located in the Southeast and generates a substantial amount of broiler litter (BL). Broiler litter is a mixture of bedding material and manure that can be a valuable nutrient source for row crop production when properly used. New technologies provide farmers with the opportunity to use a combination of BL and inorganic fertilizers with minimal environmental impact. The first part of the project evaluated integrated N management systems that... L. Fitzgerald, E. Ritchey, J. Mcgrath, J. Shockley, H. Poffenbarger

6. Corn Yield Response to Sub-Surface Banded Starter Fertilizer in the U.S.

Sub-surface fertilizer application at planting (i.e., starter fertilization) is a common practice in U.S. corn (Zea Mays L.) production to improve early-season nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency, and plant growth, especially under cool and moist spring soil conditions. However, yield increases from starter applications can vary across production systems and environments. Here, we use a meta-analysis approach to quantify and generalize corn yield responses to sub-surface starter... D. Quinn, C. Lee, H. Poffenbarger

7. Effects of Silicon Supplementation on Growth and Silicon Accumulation in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera)

This study assessed the effect of silicon (Si) supplementation on biomass production and Si accumulation of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Plants were grown in buffered Hoagland’s media (pH 6) with four Na2SiO4 treatments (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 mM). The two species responded differently to Si supplementation in terms of biomass. For bentgrass, biomass was enhanced by Si supplementation, but only significantly (p... S. Qian, J. Unrine, H. Poffenbarger

8. Comparison of Wheat and Barley to Rye as a Cover Crop for Corn

Winter cereal cover crops have become an essential management practice for sustainable corn production. Rye is the most popular winter cereal for cover crop, but wheat and barley may provide a comparable value due to their similar fibrous root systems. Winter cereals provide organic matter, scavenge residual nutrients, and protect the soil from erosion. Winter cereals can immobilize nutrients for the corn crop and can reduce corn stands in some situations, reducing corn yield. The primary objective... R. Nalley, C. Lee, H. Poffenbarger

9. An Evaluation of Summer Cover Crops for Agroecosystem Services in Small Grain Systems

Cover cropping has been gaining popularity in recent years, specifically for its ability to improve soil properties and suppress weeds. However, cover crop species differ in the agroecosystem services they provide. Our objective was to evaluate a variety of summer cover crop treatments and their ability to provide soil physical protection, increased yield and quality of subsequent small grains, nitrogen input reduction, and weed suppression. Six summer cover treatments were evaluated for these... S. Watkins, H. Poffenbarger, D. Van sanford